Literature Review - Transformational Leadership Essay

Literature Review - Transformational Leadership - Essay ExampleIn his discussion on political leading, Burns defined transformational leadership as a process wherein leaders and followers mutually promote each other to higher levels of morality and motivation (Jandaghi Matin & Farjami, 2009, p. 211). Another rendering identifying transformational leadership as a process is that of Bass (1998) who described transformational leadership not as a characteristic but as a process wherein one person creates a link with another(prenominal) person, thereby establishing a connection that helps increase the level of motivation and morality, both for the leader and for the follower. Two elements depend common to these definitions, that of citing morality as the motivation for behavior, and the strong personal relationship between leader and follower, or between persons, as the source of that motivation. According to Barker (2001), leadership is (1) a process not specifically a function of th e person in charge, but a function of individual wills and needs communicate by the dynamics of the collective will (2) a process of adaptation and of evolution, a deviation from company involving the dynamic exchange and interchange of valuate and (3) a process of energy, not structure. Leadership and change because go hand in hand they are the two most important, yet most ruffianly elements of organizational behavior (Burnes & By, 2011). Leadership is concerned with bringing about transformational change. The fundamental differences between managers and leaders Managers rump be dismissed from their jobs for breaking rules leaders can be dismissed for not breaking the rules when it is called for. feat measures against which managers are evaluated are clear and short-term criteria for judging leaders are more vague and long-term. Transformational v transactional leadership The study by Jiao, Richards and Zhang (2011) observed that transformational leaders and transactional leaders are often viewed in collocation and therefore contrasted against each other. However, there are successful leaders whose style and approach applies both transactional and transformational leadership principles. Transactional leadership is described as a process whereby followers perform assigned tasks in pact with the leaders instructions in contemplation of rewards and praise, while leaders ensure that the promised remuneration or praise, together with the resources necessary to complete the task, are given as promised. The deal becomes a quid-pro-quo, a raillery with each party working towards their own self-interest. Transformational leadership, however, involves profound change, wherein the leaders raise their followers awareness of the value and importance of specified outcomes, and suggest ways by which the follower may attain these outcomes. Leaders beguile their followers and motivate them with a moral purpose, so that they transcend their personal interests and w ork for the collective benefit, in the process fulfilling a higher order need. When the two (i.e., transactional and