Introduction to International Relations

In the context of the idea of Nationalism, what atomic number 18 the differences amid the economical National semi governwork forcetal political caller and the British National fellowship? BODY OF WORK Being today a primaeval cope of the modern world, Nationalism, a term from nasci which means to be born, has approximately of the time been considered as a 19th century phenomenon, connected to the festering and universe of discourse of nation-states .While seen by a large number of critics as out-of-date in other word old, not just because it is inherently expansionist merely also destructive, others in meantime see it as a strength to re-enforce army and solve conflict. Thus, the issue of interior(a)ism get out thitherfrom depend on a clay e actually country adopts. If we get a line the United Kingdom(UK),a constitutional monarchy and unitary states which is composed of four(4) countries England(London),Northern Ireland(Belfast),Wales(Cardiff) and Scotland(Edinb urgh) has been governed by a fan tanary system.However,it is argued that patriotism in spite of appearance the UK is both reactionary and progressive . The simply rationality of this statement is that in different parts of UK,the notion of subject fieldism has comp iodinnts of both looking towards the future inclusively and progressively but ,also looking to their past regressively and then hoping to bring back their historical period.Britain and Scotland, cosmos among these parts of UK, guide for a centuries had political parties sometimes ground on similar ideas but virtually of the time different from to each one others. The British patriotism referring to the nationalist ideas and policies action to the United Kingdom tends to promote the UK as a goal for national identity, social movements, comprises political and sentiment inspired by the love of British language, culture , history and ot forgotten the pride of being British. Supported ,politically from the Euro in credulity of the conservative United Kingdom Independence Party and far- effective British national caller to the centre-right conservative Party and the left-centrist Liberal Democrats, British nationalism has had a progressive cause characterised by a powerful but ambivalent force in British politics.From this British nationalism, a caller called the British national party will be one of our aim studies in this topic. As for Scotland, Nationalism being a political ideology and created in 1921 as primarily body based in London and largely influenced by Sinn Fein ,has most of the time supported great autonomy for Scotland as part of the United Kingdom, but also the creation of a sovereign state.In which case economical nationalism can be referred to three (3) main elements -The Scottish Independence with the advocacy of Scotland becoming a sovereign state -The Scottish national party with the main political party that support Scottish Independence. -The Scottish home rule, an o rganisation knew earlier the Devolved Scottish Parliament was created in 1999 that had for purpose to give Scotland the autonomy within the British Empire. From this nationalism , derived a national party called the Scottish national party.It is therefore in the serve up Nationalism that, our aim target will be to identify the differences surrounded by the two major national parties in the United Kingdom known as the British National Party (BNP) and the Scottish National To begin with, we should start by saying that the Scottish National Party (SNP), a civic party with strong popular leanings and non-nationalist was first created in (1934) having as aim to promote justice, caring and adventurous community by making Scottish potential as an autarkic nation in the mainstream of modern europium.Wishing to be completely independent from Britain, the Scottish national party has al authoritys wanted to be a fork state making its own decisions not just in europium but throughout th e world, this is why Scottish political parties such as, the SNP abet progressive attitudes that atomic number 18 principally based on two main(2) thingsthe keen-sighted term desire to become but also the ambition to be entirely inclusive with global organisation such as Europe . While the British National Party, reated in (1982) by a collection of the National Front with John Tyndall, is a far-right, fascist political party combined with a white supremacy organisation that stands for anti-non british,because it believes that there argon significant differences between races, one of the partys main objectives is to sterilize by legal method actings white heathenishity, which existed prior to 1948 in a way that anything that does not fit their narrow stereotype is meant to be kept off from the party.Adding to this, it has to be said that the British national party adoring men worry Adolf Hitler of German Nazi is almost claimed to be a Nazi political party as well. Another re ason that makes the difference between the two parties is that, the Scottish national party has always wanted an outspoken door to all races and nationalities in the sense that even non-Scottish people take on been accepted to be members of the party without forgetting the fact that this was the first party to cod a Muslim MSP as member.After independence, anyone animateness in Scotland could claim a Scottish citizenship under the SNP constitution with an contribute door indemnity on immigration comp bed to Britain ,where immigration still a dominant issue so blaming immigrants for any possible problem . It is even believed that the British national party has for wish to put the white British- born before immigrants and non- british,stopping immigration and deport people of different races, presently living in the UK to the respective countries .In a speech given by Nick Griffin ,the actual attraction of the British national party(BNP),he declared that it is probably now to o tardily to anticipate a return to the status quo ante 1948 therefore suggested a new model of milti-culturalism. This model was meant to lead by a policy of cultural and biological separation ,not by principles of integration, this could allow people to make whoopie each others culture and tradition but each staying on their own in order to avoid diversity which could be but a short lived stepping stone to nothingness.An expected outcome of the method as Tyndall said, was going to be in the image of a south-African apartheid-style system with like he said separate communities of people Indian ,Pakistani, Bangladeshi(Hindu and Muslim),African and Afro-Caribbean and promised land knows what else-living side by side in Britain in separate enclaves. This is to coming into court that although immigrations issues were trying to be solved there were nevertheless still based on strict principles that had to be followed. Principles that were completely different from the one the Scott ish national party made.These days, the Scottish national party does not admit a lot to deal with national parties in eastern and central Europe particularly because most of them are rather right wing ,among them men like, Michal Kaminski of the polish law and justice party. Also, in the European parliament for Freedom and fatherland party, it will be noticed that men like David Cameron will definitely be comfortable to sit with Latvia whereas it would be challenging if not never for the Scottish party to Roberts Zile from the FFF to the next Bannockburn shindig.This is to prove that racism is not a big concern in Scottish nationalism because there is no race problem in Scotland. Moreover, there are also differences regarding the concern of the British and Scottish public as a whole. While Scotland is much much concerned close the unemployment as a big problem to face, Britain on its side is more worried about the economic field which is very frequent nowadays.In the other han d, crime, law and order are very serious matters in Britain than in Scotland where it is more plausibly to be concerned about the education. Furthermore ,another difference between the British national party and the Scottish one is that, the Scottish national party, being left wing is very focused on what people living in Scotland will be in the future regardless what the piety or skin colour are, while the British national, being right wing wants to go back to their old values.In terms of Military issue, providing that it is the regimen in Westminster that is in charge to send soldiers at war, Scotland plays a very small part in sending soldiers for defence ,war and terrorism compared to Britain that is more concerned about this issue. To conclude with this topic, it shall be said that although, these two are different parties in different countries, the differences between them is all about Racism, Immigrations and governmental issues.In terms of racism, the British national p arty states that their constitution has for purpose, the preservation of the ethnic and national typical character of the British people themselves . David Blackburn writes for the spectator hot chocolate house that the BNP is no longer a racist party, but a party of racists in respond to the news that the British national party membership look to vote in favour of allowing the non-whites and non-British to join the party while the Scottish national party has always wanted an open door to all races and nationalities no matter colour, gender and creed there are.In terms of political issues, Scotland is a minority within the UK (United Kingdom) which means the decision-making process stays in the goal of the majority included Britain . Therefore policies that equip Scotland are often not taken into consideration. In terms of immigrations issues, differences have also been seen above with the British national party wanting to repatriate all immigrants or sometimes create strict princ iples that have to be followed by all immigrants. Whereas, the Scottish national party has and still trash against immigration, thus giving citizenship to those claiming for it.So basically, these are some of the differences in brief between the British national party and the Scottish national party, although there could others points agree to different points of viReferences and Bibliography David B. , Nick G. ,Changing course or changing habit? Reflection on the ideological evolution of the British national party 1999-2006 , pp81 Iain M. , gardian. co. uk, Monday 8 June 2009 14. 00 BST IN Last night was the SNPs night Arthur A. ,Nationalism, retrogression and the Challenge to the United Kingdom